Enterprise AI Adoption Up Significantly Since 2020 Amid COVID-19 Challenges, Says New Appen Study
AI budgets are up significantly over the past year as companies compete to survive and grow market share during the global pandemic, according to Appen, which published its "State of AI and Machine Learning" report this week. The study also detected a correlation between AI budget size and the likelihood that AI projects will actually be deployed on the one hand, and budgets and the use of external data providers on the other.
Now in its seventh year, Appen’s State of AI seeks to generate a broad snapshot of AI investments across the United States. The training data vendor contracted with Harris Poll to investigate various aspects of AI investments and project management at 500 companies, all of which had at least 100 employees.
The growth in AI budgets was perhaps the most compelling result to come out of the study, which had a margin of error of ± 5 percent. According to the study, the number of companies with budgets ranging from $500k to $5 million increased by 55 percent compared to last year. What’s more, Appen found that only 26 percent of survey respondents reported having an AI budget of less than $500,000, down significantly from last year, when 40 percent of survey respondents indicated that level of spending.
This points to a significant uptick in spending on AI, says Appen CEO Mark Brayan, who said the results “clearly indicate that companies are going all-in on AI.”
“When we first set out to understand the state of AI and machine learning seven years ago, organizations globally were eager to start AI projects but weren’t making meaningful progress,” Brayan stated in a press release. “Today, in a time of transition during the pandemic, AI is considered core to survival, and we see this in the results of the survey – increased budgets, more technologists in charge, and increased reliance on external training data providers.”
Larger companies tended to have higher AI budgets, according to the study, which is not surprising. The use of an external provider of training data also correlated with having a higher budget, irrespective of company size. That indicates that use of external data is a mark of maturity of AI projects, Appen suggests.
“High-quality data is the foundation for success for every AI project, and no amount of tweaking of algorithms can negate the consequences of bad data,” Wilson Pang, CTO at Appen, stated in a press release. “Companies that want to deliver better results faster understand that third-party training data is a must.”
Interestingly, small and mid-size companies showed a higher rate of using third-party training data and data management providers (such as Appen) than their larger brethren, according to the study. Ninety percent of small businesses used these external data providers, while 92 percent of mid-size businesses did, the study shows, but only 85 percent of large enterprises used them.
“Companies who use external data providers are 1.5 times more likely to say their company is ahead of others in AI deployment, and four times less likely to say that they are lagging,” Appen states in its report. “This is likely tied with the fact that companies that use external data providers deploy substantially more projects than those that don’t, as well as to achieving meaningful ROI.”
The study also suggests that companies with higher AI budgets also tend to have a higher rate of deploying AI projects into production. That may sound obvious, but considering the significant AI project failure rate in recent years, the fact that deployments are trending with budgets is a positive sign for CFOs under pressure to deliver a return on AI investment.
Read the rest of this story on our sister site, Datanami.